<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="Siterun Data Services - Linlarservices.com" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_rss/rssfeed.php?rss=/siterun_feeds/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court">
        <title>Four Winds 10 - fourwinds10.com &gt;&gt; Government &gt;&gt; Judicial And Courts &gt;&gt; Supreme Court</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://ec2-34-197-6-90.compute-1.amazonaws.com</link>
       <dc:date>2026-04-28T15:36:24+01:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1657296826"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1654801299"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1654715049"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652985883"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652897331"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652555703"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651770082"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651693206"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651690375"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1650469206"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1649434129"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1648575910"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1648147465"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1644692910"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643648519"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643648333"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643303215"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643302780"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643053547"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642703695"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642533069"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642187059"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641841919"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641840809"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641671579"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641578014"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641319874"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1640286948"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1640281635"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1639683110"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1639595245"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1638552029"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1635791551"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1631288863"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1631286159"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1630080583"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1629914782"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1629565278"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1628870999"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1626454594"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625503932"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625244570"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625240076"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625066812"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1623171981"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1621263761"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1619447936"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1618591552"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1618591024"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1617633780"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1657296826">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. Wade, Ending 50 Years of Abortion Rights</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1657296826</link>
        <description>7- 9-22 In a stunning reversal of 50 years of precedent, the US Supreme Court on Friday struck down Roe v. Wade, which protected the rights of women to seek abortions, leaving individual states free to ban outright or severely limit the right to a procedure that women have had since 1973. &amp;ldquo;Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,&amp;rdquo; Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion. &amp;ldquo;Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences&amp;hellip; It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people&amp;rsquo;s elected representatives.&amp;rdquo; In the final sentence of the dissent opinion, the court&amp;rsquo;s liberal justices, Stephen Breyer (Hon.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1654801299">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Biden threatens 'executive orders' if Roe is overturned</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1654801299</link>
        <description>6-9-22 &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re looking into that right now&amp;#39; In an effort to slow the catastrophic plunge he&amp;#39;s seen in his approval rating from American voters &amp;ndash; now under 40% -- Joe Biden took to the television stage on comedian Jimmy Kimmel&amp;#39;s show this week. And he threatened to use &amp;quot;executive orders&amp;quot; to reverse a Supreme Court opinion that could overturn Roe v. Wade. That decision, in a Mississippi abortion dispute, appears likely, as a draft opinion from a majority of the court was leaked several weeks ago indicating at least five justices were ready to toss Roe and give regulation of America&amp;#39;s lucrative abortion industry back to the states. On that topic, Biden called the idea of canceling Roe, which long has been recognized as being based on the &amp;quot;penumbras&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;emanations&amp;quot; of the Constitution, not the Constitution itself, is &amp;quot;just ridiculous.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1654715049">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Biden’s White House Radicalized the Would-Be Kavanaugh Killer as Pelosi Held Up Supreme Court Security Funds.</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1654715049</link>
        <description>6-8-22 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Joe Biden&amp;rsquo;s White House intentionally fanned the flames of the violent, irate political left after the recent Democrat leak of a Supreme Court opinion, as well as the latest Uvalde school shooting. The result has been an attempt on the life of a Supreme Court Justice. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; In amongst the political fracas, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is said to be holding up a Senate bill which would grant more security for Supreme Court justices. The U.S.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652985883">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SOTN:  The SCOTUS leaker of Alito’s Roe v Wade opinion is outed.</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652985883</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652897331">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SOTN:  SCOTUS BLOCKBUSTER! RE: Roe v Wade Opinion Leak</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652897331</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652555703">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Video: Clarence Thomas Says Roe v Wade Draft Leak Destroyed Trust At Supreme Court</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1652555703</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651770082">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Leaked SCOTUS decision--what's next . . .</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651770082</link>
        <description>5-7-22 &amp;nbsp; Wow! A confirmed draft of a majority decision by the U.S. Supreme Court was leaked on the pending abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women&amp;rsquo;s Health Organization. This 98-page draft opinion dismantles the abortion decisions of Roe v.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651693206">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>just the beginning . . .</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651693206</link>
        <description>5-4-22 The leaked draft from the U.S. Supreme Court is pushing the abortion battle in Congress and the states. At this point, massive firestorms are brewing at multiple levels. In light of the leaked ruling that will overturn Roe v.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651690375">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SORCHA FAAL:  Democrats SCREAM AND WAIL After Supreme Court “Return Authority To The People” Ruling</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1651690375</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1650469206">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Kavanaugh, Barrett reject appeal of Airman who refuses COVID shot</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1650469206</link>
        <description>4-19-22 Trump appointees again side with court&amp;#39;s left flank in vaccine-mandate case President Trump appointees Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett joined the Supreme Court&amp;#39;s left flank in rejecting an emergency appeal from an Air Force Reserve officer who was punished for his refusal to take the COVID-19 vaccine. Lt. Col. Jonathan Dunn was appealing to the high court after the Air Force rejected his request for a religious exemption and removed him from command. Dunn argues in his April 9 emergency appeal that he &amp;quot;acquired natural immunity to the disease&amp;quot; after contracting COVID-19 last summer.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1649434129">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Senate confirms Biden nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1649434129</link>
        <description>4-8-22 Vote was bipartisan, 53-47 (FOX NEWS) &amp;ndash; The Senate Thursday confirmed Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court and fulfilled President Biden&amp;#39;s campaign promise to appoint the first Black woman to the high court. The vote was bipartisan, 53-47, with Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mitt Romney of Utah voting for Jackson. The Republican senators previously announced their support for the history-making confirmation saying she is well-qualified. Vice President Kamala Harris presided over the confirmation vote Thursday afternoon.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1648575910">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Shock: Biden SCOTUS Pick Defends Black Supremacists</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1648575910</link>
        <description>3-29-22 Supremacists &amp;nbsp; President Joe Biden&amp;rsquo;s affirmative action Supreme Court pick Ketanji Brown Johnson once called a murderous black supremacy terrorist group &amp;ldquo;a cultural community&amp;rdquo; that is centered around &amp;ldquo;healthy living.&amp;rdquo; &amp;nbsp; Johnson made the remark about the Black Hebrew Israelites, an insane group of black racial supremacist who preach terror and have committed murderous acts targeting Jews and white people. &amp;ldquo;This case involved a small community, a cultural community of people who believe in vegan lifestyles. They call themselves African Hebrew Israelites, but it&amp;rsquo;s not a religious community, it&amp;rsquo;s a cultural community around healthy living,&amp;rdquo; Johnson said while referencing a case involving the Black Hebrew Israelites during her confirmation hearings. Big League Politics reported on a terror rampage conducted in 2019 by a Black Hebrew Israelite adherent at a kosher deli that resulted in six people dead, including one police officer&amp;hellip; Read more&amp;hellip; &amp;nbsp; https://con-alerts.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1648147465">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Biden’s SCOTUS Pick: “I Don’t Know” When Life Begins</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1648147465</link>
        <description>3-24-22 President Joe Biden&amp;rsquo;s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, revealed to the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday that she does not know when human life begins. The next day, Jackson said that she &amp;ldquo;did not want to speculate&amp;rdquo; about a preborn baby&amp;rsquo;s viability. During committee hearings Tuesday, Senator John Kennedy (R-La.) questioned D.C.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1644692910">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Expert warns 'Barrett rule' could sting Democrats on Supreme Court nominee</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1644692910</link>
        <description>2-11-22 Biden to pick replacement for retiring justice Stephen Breyer Constitutional expert Jonathan Turley is warning that the &amp;quot;Barrett Rule&amp;quot; created by Democrats when they were attacking President Trump&amp;#39;s nominee to the Supreme Court, Amy Coney Barrett, could sting them in the coming congressional hearings for Joe Biden&amp;#39;s nominee. He&amp;#39;s to announce his pick soon for a replacement for Justice Stephen Breyer, who is retiring. Turley wrote in an online column that Democrats now are urging senators to have an &amp;quot;open mind&amp;quot; about Biden&amp;#39;s pick. &amp;quot;In the case of Amy Coney Barrett&amp;rsquo;s nomination, Sen. Angus King Jr.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643648519">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Murdock: Mrs. Justice Kamala Harris: Migraine for America, Motrin for Joe Biden</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643648519</link>
        <description>January 31, 2022 Even as the U.S. Supreme Court weighs the constitutionality of racial preferences via Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and a companion action against UNC, President Joe Biden has restated a campaign promise: If elected, he would nominate a black woman to the nation&amp;rsquo;s highest tribunal. More concretely, to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer &amp;mdash; whites, Hispanics, Americans of Asian descent, and men need not apply.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643648333">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Report: 76% of Americans Want Biden to Consider ‘All Nominees’ in Supreme Court Pick</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643648333</link>
        <description>January 31, 2022 &amp;nbsp; According to a recent ABC News-Ipsos poll, an overwhelming majority of Americans want President Biden to consider Supreme Court nominees regardless of race and gender. &amp;nbsp; Background: Last week, liberal-leaning Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer announced his retirement. During the 2020 presidential campaign, Biden pledged to nominate a Black woman to the bench if he had the opportunity during his term. Biden made the pledge shortly after President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett to the bench following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. &amp;nbsp; What Happened: A poll by ABC News-Ipsos revealed that 76% of Americans want Biden to consider &amp;ldquo;all nominees&amp;rdquo; to the Supreme Court, not only Black women.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643303215">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Will predictions that Biden will install Kamala on Supreme Court prove true?</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643303215</link>
        <description>1-26-22 Nomination could help Biden &amp;#39;solve the problem&amp;#39; of her unpopularity That Joe Biden might nominate his vice president, Kamala Harris, to the U.S. Supreme Court was making the rounds on news and other sites on Wednesday literally before newscasters finished their announcement that Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer was retiring. It&amp;#39;s true that she does check the boxes that Biden imposed, as a candidate, when he said he would make sure a black woman was nominated first. She has Indian and Jamaican parents.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643302780">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Stunning claim: 'Brutal sexual assault' by next pick for U.S. Supreme Court</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643302780</link>
        <description>1-26-22 &amp;#39;The perpetrator was whomever Biden nominates&amp;#39; With Justice Stephen Breyer stepping down from the U.S. Supreme Court, there&amp;#39;s suddenly plenty of speculation about what comes next, and the identity of his potential replacement. Now, Roger Stone, a close associate of former President Donald Trump, has posted a stunning message on Gab.com.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643053547">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>X22REPORT:  SCOTUS Decision Needed, Trap Set, It Will All Be Revealed, Tick Tock – Ep. 2684</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1643053547</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642703695">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Denies Trump Plea to Block Jan. 6 Records Request</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642703695</link>
        <description>January 20, 2022 The Supreme Court has officially rejected former President Trump&amp;rsquo;s request to block records from being handed over to the House Select Committee investigating Jan. 6. Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone dissenter but offered no opinion in the unsigned ruling. The move clears the way for the House committee to obtain Trump-era schedules, call logs, emails, and other requested documents they say are needed in their investigation. The Hill reports: &amp;nbsp; The committee said it had begun receiving records Wednesday night just hours after a ruling that chairman Rep.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642533069">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Rejects Effort to End Airline Mask Mandates</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642533069</link>
        <description>1-18-2 &amp;nbsp; Advertisement STAND With RAND: Fire Fauci for His Lies [ACT NOW] The Supreme Court rejected a bid to finally end travel mask mandates. &amp;nbsp; Background: Under an executive order from President Biden, the Transportation Security Administration requires all passengers to wear masks on planes and other public methods of transportation in an effort to reduce Covid-19 transmission. &amp;nbsp; What Happened: A man filed an emergency application on behalf of himself and his 4-year-old son, both of which are autistic and claim to be medically incapable of wearing masks for extended periods. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The emergency application was fled to Justice Neil Gorsuch who handles emergency applications arising in several western states, and he referred the matter to the full court. &amp;nbsp; The court rejected the request without comment.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642187059">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Blocks Biden Vaccine Mandate</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1642187059</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641841919">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Replace Sotomayor with Pinocchio or Bozo the Clown; make idiocy even more visible---if possible</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641841919</link>
        <description>During the Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s oral arguments over the Biden vaccine mandates, Justice S-Protein issued a gem... &amp;nbsp; Replace Sotomayor with Pinocchio or Bozo the Clown; make idiocy even more visible---if possible by Jon Rappoport (To read about Jon&amp;#39;s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) During the Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s oral arguments over the Biden vaccine mandates, Justice S-Protein issued this gem: &amp;nbsp; &amp;ldquo;We have over 100,000 children, which we&amp;rsquo;ve never had before, in serious condition and many on ventilators.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641840809">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Corrects Transcript, Notes Gorsuch Didn’t Make False Flu Claim</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641840809</link>
        <description>1-10-22 The Supreme Court has updated its official transcript of court proceedings that took place last week, clarifying that Justice Neil Gorsuch did not make a false claim about the flu. The nation&amp;rsquo;s top court heard oral arguments on Friday for and against two Biden administration COVID-19 vaccine mandates, including one promulgated against every business with 100 or more workers by the Department of Labor&amp;rsquo;s&amp;nbsp;Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Gorsuch, a Trump nominee, during questioning of Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, said that polio &amp;ldquo;was a terrible scourge on this country for many years&amp;rdquo; but that the federal government has never mandated it for workers through OSHA. &amp;ldquo;We have flu vaccines. The flu kills, I believe, hundreds of thousands of people every year.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641671579">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>COVID-1984Build Back Bustbidenflation ragesDem Cities LawlessMasters of the UniverseChina Threat  Fact Check: Justice Breyer Suggests Vaccines, Masks Would Prevent 100% of Coronavirus Infections</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641671579</link>
        <description>1-8-22 CLAIM: Vaccine mandates and masks would prevent all of the 750,000 daily new coronavirus cases in the current surge. VERDICT: PARTLY FALSE. While vaccines and masks would prevent many cases, they do not prevent all transmission. On Friday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments to consider a stay against the Biden administration&amp;rsquo;s vaccine mandates on large private employers. Under the rule, enforced by the&amp;nbsp;Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the federal government would impose a vaccine mandate for the first time, with a &amp;ldquo;mask-and-test&amp;rdquo; alternative for unvaccinated workers.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641578014">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court hearing arguments over Biden's COVID shot mandates for millions</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641578014</link>
        <description>1-7-22 &amp;#39;T A fight that has been called &amp;quot;the defining issue of the 2022 election cycle&amp;quot; is up before the Supreme Court on Friday, where the nine justices will hear arguments from the Biden administration that it can order Americans to take experimental treatments at will. Or that the Constitution doesn&amp;#39;t give the president the authority to impose medical treatments through the COVID shots. Americans already have express their own opinion, with the results of a poll by Convention of States Action, in partnership with The Trafalgar Group, showing 51.1% of voters say they favor a bill in Congress to block Biden&amp;#39;s dictates. Only about 41% say they do not support the block.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641319874">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Tick, Tick, Tick...: The Supreme Court Readies An Explosive Docket For 2022</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1641319874</link>
        <description>1-4-22 Below is my column in the Hill on upcoming year for the Supreme Court. The Court&amp;rsquo;s docket is likely to put the institution at ground zero of a heated election year. Major decisions on abortion and gun rights are expected by June 2022. Even with&amp;nbsp;Chief Justice John Roberts denouncing attempts at &amp;ldquo;inappropriate political influence&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;on the Court, the threats of Court packing and other measures are likely to become even more shrill as these decisions rollout in the new year. Here is the column: The late Justice&amp;nbsp;Ruth Bader Ginsburg&amp;nbsp;once observed that &amp;ldquo;it&amp;rsquo;s hard not to have a big year at the Supreme Court.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1640286948">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SORHA FAAL:  Supreme Court Starts 15 Day Countdown To Save America</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1640286948</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1640281635">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Will Hear Vaccine Mandate Challenges in January</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1640281635</link>
        <description>12-23-21 The Supreme Court will begin hearing legal challenges to President Biden&amp;rsquo;s employer vaccine mandate next month. The Hill reports: In a pair of orders issued Wednesday, the court said it would hear oral arguments on Jan. 7 over&amp;nbsp;President Biden&amp;lsquo;s vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers and a regulation from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requiring vaccines for health care workers. In scheduling the accelerated timeline for the cases, the Supreme Court deferred ruling on whether to block the new rules until after hearing the challenges. White House press secretary&amp;nbsp;Jen Psaki&amp;nbsp;said&amp;nbsp;in a statement Wednesday night the administration is &amp;ldquo;confident in the legal authority&amp;rdquo; of the requirements and the Department of Justice will &amp;ldquo;vigorously defend&amp;rdquo; the measures.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1639683110">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SORCHA FAAL:  “Breathtaking Path Of Destruction” Blazed By US Supreme Court Backs Russia And China</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1639683110</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1639595245">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SORCHA FAAL:  America Warned Is “Past The Point Of No Return” As Supreme Court Hammer Blow Looms</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1639595245</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1638552029">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Roe v. Wade is indefensible on every level. Will the Supreme Court admit it?</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1638552029</link>
        <description>12-3-21 The facts are obvious. Whether our justices will follow them is not. &amp;nbsp; In a sane country with a Supreme Court committed to doing its job honestly, Dobbs v. Jackson Women&amp;rsquo;s Health Organization would be a done deal. There wouldn&amp;rsquo;t be any question that Mississippi&amp;rsquo;s ban on abortion at 15 weeks was perfectly constitutional, nor would there be any doubt of a complete reversal of the past half-century of pro-abortion judicial precedent.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1635791551">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>U.S. Supreme Court rejects religious challenge to Maine vaccine mandate</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1635791551</link>
        <description>11-1-21 The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday turned away healthcare workers seeking a religious exemption to&amp;nbsp;Maine&amp;#39;s COVID-19 vaccine&amp;nbsp;mandate in the latest battle over vaccination to reach the justices. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, rejected a request made by nine unnamed plaintiffs who identified themselves as healthcare workers who object to receiving the shots on religious grounds. The court previously rejected challenges to&amp;nbsp;vaccine mandates in New York and Indiana, though those cases did not involve religious objections.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1631288863">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Justice Breyer Issues Warning to Democrats Who Want to Remake Supreme Court</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1631288863</link>
        <description>9-10-21 Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, on April 23, 2021. Seated from left: Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Standing from left: Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. (Erin Schaff/Pool/Getty Images) Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer issued a warning on Democrats wanting to remake the Supreme Court, including expanding the institution with justices, suggesting that Republicans will exploit Democrats&amp;rsquo; agenda. Breyer, in a wide-ranging interview with NPR, said he will not kowtow to calls from progressive lawmakers to retire due to his age.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1631286159">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Justice Breyer Warns On Repercussions Of Court Packing</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1631286159</link>
        <description>September 10, 2021 | Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer is warning against packing the Supreme Court and reminding progressives that if they move forward the move will have consequences. According to reports from Newsmax: &amp;ldquo;What goes around comes around. And if the Democrats can do it, the Republicans can do it,&amp;rdquo; Breyer told&amp;nbsp;NPR&amp;nbsp;in an interview published Friday. &amp;hellip; Biden has formed a commission to study potential&amp;nbsp;changes to the court. Democrats again&amp;nbsp;called&amp;nbsp;to pack the Supreme Court with four more members after the justices declined to block a Texas law that makes abortions illegal six weeks after pregnancy.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1630080583">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Ends Biden’s Eviction Moratorium</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1630080583</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1629914782">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Orders Biden Admin to Reinstate ‘Remain in Mexico’ Policy</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1629914782</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1629565278">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Justice Amy Coney Barrett Sides With Obama</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1629565278</link>
        <description>August 20, 2021 Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with Barack Obama about an issue concerning his presidential library. Barrett denied a petition to stop the construction of the Obama Foundation library in Chicago. According to Fox News: &amp;nbsp; &amp;ldquo;We greatly appreciate the continued support of our project and process by the courts, including now from the highest court in the land,&amp;rdquo; an Obama Foundation spokesperson told Fox News on Friday. &amp;ldquo;With their support, and the outpouring of support we&amp;rsquo;ve received from so many on the South Side and across the city of Chicago, we were so pleased to be able to kick off our construction this past week and get us one day closer to doors opening at the Obama Presidential Center.&amp;rdquo; The advocacy group Protect Our Parks and other plaintiffs had tried to halt the construction of the Obama presidential library in Chicago&amp;rsquo;s Jackson Park this week, citing it would be harmful to the local environment.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1628870999">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Justice Amy Coney Barrett Sides With Government Over Students</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1628870999</link>
        <description>8-13-21 Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett refused to grant relief to Indiana University students who were fighting against the school requirement that all students be vaccinated against the coronavirus. According to MSN: Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday rejected a plea from a group of Indiana University students to stop the university&amp;rsquo;s requirement that all students be vaccinated against the coronavirus. Barrett, who received the request because she is the Supreme Court justice tasked with emergency petitions from that region of the country, did not give a reason. It appears she made the decision on her own, as she did not mention referring the matter to the other justices. It was the first case about vaccination requirements to reach the Supreme Court.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1626454594">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Liberal SCOTUS Justice Infuriates Democrats Over Retirement Decision</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1626454594</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625503932">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court victory intensifies this battle . . .</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625503932</link>
        <description>7-5-21 An American Olympic trials athlete abused her moment on the bronze podium during the National Anthem to turn her back on the U.S. flag and cover her head with a shirt bearing the words, &amp;quot;Activist Athlete.&amp;quot; This same anti-American attitude is evident in the rising Marxist/socialist movement, using race to divide us, encouraging censorship, and disenfranchising and attacking our voting process and election system. America has a choice between two paths.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625244570">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeal From Florist Who Refused Service Over Same-Sex Wedding</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625244570</link>
        <description>7-2-21 The Supreme Court on Friday declined to hear an appeal over a florist&amp;rsquo;s refusal to offer service for a wedding of a same-sex couple, allowing a state court&amp;rsquo;s ruling that the shop engaged in unlawful discrimination. The court ruled 6-3 in declining to take it up. At least four justices need to vote in favor of granting a petition to authorize a review of a case. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas voted in favor (pdf) of taking the case. The Supreme Court didn&amp;rsquo;t provide an explanation for its denial to hear the case, stating, in part: &amp;ldquo;The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625240076">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Rules on AZ Voting Rights Case</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625240076</link>
        <description>July 1, 2021 This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available. Thursday morning the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Arizona&amp;rsquo;s voting rights case, upholding two voting restrictions in the state. The court split between its more and conservative-leaning and liberal-leaning justices 6-3. The case was brought by the Democratic National Committee and backed by Arizona&amp;rsquo;s Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Ronna McDaniel @GOPChairwoman &amp;middot; Jul 1, 2021 Today&amp;#39;s United States Supreme Court ruling is a resounding victory for election integrity and the rule of law.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625066812">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SCOTUS Rules to Maintain CDC’s Eviction Moratorium</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1625066812</link>
        <description>June 30, 2021 The Supreme Court has voted to maintain the Center for Disease Control and Prevention&amp;rsquo;s eviction moratorium. The order was put in place as a response to the Coronavirus pandemic to ensure renters who couldn&amp;rsquo;t make payments due to the virus were not displaced. The court ruled 5-4 against an emergency request from landlords asking to end the moratorium which was recently extended through July. The Hill reports: The landlord group had asked the justices to lift the stay on a ruling by a federal judge in Washington, D.C.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1623171981">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Unanimously Rules Illegal Immigrants Do Not Have Right to Green Cards</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1623171981</link>
        <description>June 7, 2021 The Supreme Court issued a 9-0 ruling Monday morning upholding the constitutionality of a current law that bars illegal immigrants from seeking green cards. The court ruled that migrants that entered the country illegally and later received &amp;nbsp;Temporary Protected Status (TPS) are still ineligible to apply for permanent residency. According to The Daily Wire: Justice Elena Kagan, widely recognized as one of the Court&amp;rsquo;s more liberal justices, wrote the unanimous opinion, upholding a rule that barred &amp;ldquo;unlawful entrants&amp;rdquo; who later received Temporary Protected Status from applying to remain in the United States. Temporary Protected Status technically &amp;ldquo;gives foreign nationals nonimmigrant status,&amp;rdquo; Kagan noted, but TPS does not rubber-stamp an &amp;ldquo;unlawful entry.&amp;rdquo; The TPS status &amp;ldquo;applies to people who come from countries ravaged by war or disaster.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1621263761">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Roe v. Wade</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1621263761</link>
        <description>May 17, 2021 The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a Mississippi abortion case that will put the current precedent set by Roe v. Wade front and center. According to CNBC: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear arguments in a major abortion case from Mississippi that could roll back limits on abortion restrictions included in the landmark reproductive rights case Roe v. Wade. The case will be the first major abortion dispute to test all three of former President Donald Trump&amp;rsquo;s three appointees to the top court, including its newest member, Justice Amy Coney Barrett.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1619447936">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Supreme Court Rejects Bid to Revive Trump Era Immigration Rule</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1619447936</link>
        <description>April 26, 2021 *This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available. The Supreme Court just denied a bid from Republican attorneys general to revive former President Trump&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;public charge&amp;rdquo; rule. Texas AG Ken Paxton led the charge to bring back the order. Last month President Biden rescinded the immigration rule. The rule made it more difficult for immigrants to obtain green cards if they were going to rely on government assistance like Medicaid or SNAP (food stamps).</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1618591552">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>“Packing courts is a play right out of the socialist handbook” – Congresswoman warns that court packing has been done BEFORE</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1618591552</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1618591024">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>Democrats are planning to pack the Supreme Court – and pack it now</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1618591024</link>
        <description></description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1617633780">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.fourwinds10.net</dc:source>
        <title>SCOTUS Dismisses Suit Over Trump Blocking Critics on Twitter</title>
        <link>http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/supreme_court/news.php?q=1617633780</link>
        <description>4-5-21 The Supreme Court voted to dismiss a lawsuit that claimed former President Trump violated the First Amendment by blocking some critics of his on the popular social media platform Twitter. The Hill reports: The lawsuit arose in 2017 after Trump&amp;rsquo;s social media account blocked seven people who had tweeted criticism of the president in comment threads linked to his @realDonaldTrump Twitter handle, which has since been banned on the platform. Lower federal courts found that Trump&amp;rsquo;s&amp;nbsp;Twitter account, where he often weighed in on official matters, constitutes a public forum and that blocking his detractors violated their constitutional free speech protections. Justice&amp;nbsp;Clarence Thomas&amp;nbsp;on Monday wrote a 12-page opinion concurring with the court&amp;rsquo;s dismissal of the case. https://trumptrainnews.</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
